Forum Replies Created
September 29, 2015 at 10:54 am #17375
Sorry to witter on about Ompalam… but Loz’s 2nd Age write-up certainly fits the 3rd age info from ‘Revealed Mythologies’ better. You should have a look.September 29, 2015 at 7:11 am #17372
There again, you do use a lot of other “non-canon” material also.
I first noticed this with Ompalam. I have to say that honestly I think the 2nd Age version is better (personal opinion).September 28, 2015 at 11:29 pm #17370
A quick question:
I notice a few “interesting” choices of source material. No usage of the 2nd Age material (i.e. the MRQII Cults book – it was written by Lawrence Whitaker after all)?
It is odd, especially as some cults are extremely unlikely to alter even in the intervening 700 years (largely due to isolation, cultural inertia etc…).
Do you not have the book, or is it personal preference? I’m just asking.June 28, 2015 at 11:01 am #16437
I’d like to see Roger Raupp (or Rudy Didier Rauben) do it.
Edit- I mean Fronrit.May 14, 2015 at 11:24 pm #15929
You might want to have a look at pp 119-121 of ‘The Abiding Book’ for some more info on Umathelan Malkionism (OK I realise that it is written from a 2nd Age perspective, but it’s largely still correct in the 3rd Age, I believe).